Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.
Spare room benefit claimant Charlotte Carmichael: "We will have to appeal"
Disabled families have lost a court challenge to social housing benefit cuts for residents with spare bedrooms in England, Wales and Scotland.
Ten families brought a judicial review over the lower payments for people in homes deemed too large.
But the High Court has ruled that the change, which was introduced in April, did not breach their human rights.
One family member described the ruling as an "absolute travesty of justice", and said they would appeal against it.
Charlotte Carmichael, who has spina bifida and sleeps in a hospital bed which, she argues, her husband and full-time carer cannot share, told the BBC that she felt obliged to pursue the case.
'Incomprehensible'Jason, her husband, added: "This is our way of life we're defending. We'll keep appealing and take it all the way we can."
Richard Stein, of law firm Leigh Day which is representing two of the families, said his clients were "bitterly disappointed with today's decision, but they are not defeated".
There are 10 claimants represented by three law firms. They are from various places including London, Stoke-on-Trent, Manchester and Birmingham. Here are the arguments of four of them:
Case one
Lawyers for one London family say they live in a damp, one-bedroom flat infested with mice. One son has autism, the other has Down's Syndrome.
The child with autism sleeps in the bedroom while his mother, father and brother sleep on the floor in the living room.
Due to the changes, they say they cannot afford to move to the larger property authorities say they need.
Case two
Charlotte Carmichael has spina bifida and sleeps in a hospital bed which, she argues, her husband and full-time carer cannot share.
He sleeps in their spare room as there is not enough space in hers for a second bed.
Case three
In 2011, six-year-old Isaac was assaulted by the then partner of his mother, leaving him traumatised. He and his mother were made homeless and assessed as needing three bedrooms because, solicitors say, of Isaac's behavioural and mental issues.
His mother lost £15.52 a week on 1 April when the council judged they were under-occupying.
Case four
A wheelchair user living in a three-bedroom bungalow shared with his stepdaughter who has a rare form of muscular dystrophy says he needs a third bedroom to store equipment including a hoist for lifting him.
He contends there are no suitable two bedroom homes in the social sector.
He added: "We, along with the other lawyers acting on behalf of adults with disabilities, will appeal this judgment and we remain confident that the discrimination which was recognised by the court and which has been perpetrated against our clients by this legislation is not justified and is unlawful."
Rebekah Carrier, a solicitor with law firm Hopkin Murray Beskine, said the government's position was "incomprehensible".
But BBC chief political correspondent Norman Smith said the verdict was a "huge relief" for the government.
A statement from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said: "We are pleased to learn that the court has found in our favour and agreed that we have fulfilled our equality duties to disabled people.
"Reform of housing benefit in the social sector is essential, so the taxpayer does not pay for people's extra bedrooms."
The government said it had already provided £150m to councils to make discretionary payments to those affected by its changes to welfare payments, but also announced that it would bolster the fund for those affected by housing benefit changes by £35m.
Our correspondent said sources had told him that the extra funding was not prompted by the court action.
This was a "benchmark policy" for ministers, both in terms of cutting spending and changing "attitudes towards housing benefit", he added.
About 660,000 working-age social housing households judged to have too many bedrooms have lost an average of £14 per week since their benefit was cut at the beginning of April.
The DWP estimated that 420,000 disabled people would be among those affected.
The families, which include either disabled adults or children, had challenged the changes during a three-day hearing in May.
Their lawyers argued the benefit cut hit disabled people disproportionately hard and was therefore discriminatory.
'Devastating'They also argued that the £25m set aside in the local authority discretionary fund for disabled people affected by the benefit cuts was insufficient.
Mr Stein explained: "The government's attempts to pass the buck to local authorities to deal with the unfairness and discrimination of the bedroom tax using discretionary housing payments is not acceptable.
"The amount of money provided by the government for these payments is nowhere near adequate to prevent large numbers of disabled people losing their homes."
Housing charity Shelter's chief executive Campbell Robb said: "This ruling is devastating news for disabled adults and families with disabled or vulnerable children, who'll be put at real risk of homelessness for having a bedroom they just can't do without.
"Shelter gave extensive evidence to the court based on our experience of how families like these are being affected, which showed that the government's current provision to support people in exceptional cases is inadequate.
"As a result of today's ruling, we're really concerned that these families will now face a real struggle to meet their rent and may end up losing their home."
A DWP spokesman has previously said that the move would bring back fairness to the housing benefit system and pointed out there were "two million households on the social housing waiting list and over a quarter of a million tenants... living in overcrowded homes".
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Housing benefit challenge fails
Dengan url
http://beritaberbagiceria.blogspot.com/2013/07/housing-benefit-challenge-fails.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Housing benefit challenge fails
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Housing benefit challenge fails
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar