A decision to halt a multimillion-pound fraud trial because of a lack of legal aid barristers has been overturned by the Court of Appeal.
Three judges quashed a ruling made after the prime minister's brother, Alex Cameron QC, argued the defendants would not get a fair trial due to cuts.
Many barristers in England and Wales are refusing to take on complex cases because of 30% cuts to their fees.
Judge Sir Brian Leveson said the row was standing in the way of justice.
End Quote Sir Brian Leveson President of the Queen's Bench DivisionProblems about representation will have to be developed considerably before such an exceptional order could be justified"
Delivering the court's ruling, he urged the Ministry of Justice and Justice Secretary Chris Grayling to work with the legal profession to end the current standoff.
"The maintenance of a criminal justice system of which we can be proud depends on a sensible resolution," he said.
'Thriving cadre'Sir Brian Leveson said the industry needed the best possible advocates to ensure trials were fair, efficient and avoided potential miscarriages of justice.
It was critical that there remained a "thriving cadre of advocates" capable of undertaking all types of publicly-funded work, he added.
In May at Southwark Crown Court, Judge Anthony Leonard QC stopped the prosecution of the five men accused of a massive land-related scam after hearing that no senior barristers would take on the case.
Mr Cameron, who worked on the bid to halt the trial free of charge, argued the controversial MoJ reforms involving cuts to legal aid would prevent the defendants finding barristers of "sufficient competence".
Judge Leonard said at the time of his ruling to halt the trial that the defence had made "very substantial... but unsuccessful" efforts to find barristers to fight the defendants' case.
But city watchdog the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) then urged appeal judges Sir Brian Leveson, Lord Justice Davis and Lord Justice Treacy to overturn Judge Leonard's decision.
During the appeal, counsel for Mr Grayling said emergency measures were being pursued to ensure the government would recruit more public defenders if self-employed barristers continued to refuse to take on very high-cost cases.
'Delivery of justice'The decision to halt the trial in May had implications for similar major prosecutions - but the Court of Appeal said on Wednesday that the judge had acted incorrectly.
In its judgement, the court said the correct course of action should have been to postpone the trial while further searches for suitable barristers continued.
Delivering Wednesday's decision, Sir Brian Leveson, president of the Queen's Bench Division, said the trial should be relisted.
He said the Court of Appeal could not and should not get involved in the row between ministers and criminal barristers over pay, but stressed it was essential advocates should be available to cover all sorts of cases.
Sir Brian Leveson said the Southwark judge had been wrong to find that there was no realistic prospect of the fraud case defendants finding competent advocates who would have sufficient time to prepare.
"We are not saying that there could not come a time when it may be appropriate to order that this indictment be stayed," he said.
"That time however remains very much in the future and problems about representation will have to be developed considerably before such an exceptional order could be justified."
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Move to halt fraud trial overturned
Dengan url
http://beritaberbagiceria.blogspot.com/2014/05/move-to-halt-fraud-trial-overturned.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Move to halt fraud trial overturned
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Move to halt fraud trial overturned
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar